Ensure that the apparatus used to conduct the vibro-acoustic/temperature test on a store, hereafter referred to as a “test item,” includes the capability of inducing the required range of temperature and vibration while, at the same time, operating and monitoring the function of the test item. Include the following considerations.
4.1 Test Facility
Ensure that the apparatus used to conduct the vibro-acoustic/temperature test includes the following:
4.1.1 General
The capability to induce the required range of temperature and vibration while, at the same time, operating and monitoring the function of the test item.
4.1.2 Acoustic Chamber
Combined application of mechanical vibration and acoustic noise is generally required to reproduce the specified vibration response of test items at the monitoring points. The mechanical input through a vibration shaker system generally supplies the energy at lower frequencies (below about 100 Hz). Acoustic pressures cannot be practically controlled at frequencies below 100 Hz where transmission of vibration energy by mechanical means is practical. Acoustic energy providing vibrational energy at monitoring points becomes the major source of such vibrational energy at higher frequencies (above roughly 300 Hz) where mechanical vibration transmission through complex mechanical connections becomes impractical. The range between these frequencies is driven by a mixture of vibration and acoustics. See Methods 514 and 515 for further guidance.
4.1.2.1 Acoustic Chamber and Acoustic Source
Ensure the chamber shape and dimensions provide for a uniform distribution of the acoustic field at frequencies above 150 Hz (paragraph 6.1, reference i). The facility must be capable of producing the required levels of acoustic energy over the range 150 to 2500 Hz. While an acoustic level of 155 dB will sometimes suffice, much higher levels (up to 165 dB) are sometimes needed. This level must be attainable with the test item and other required equipment in the chamber. Because acoustic levels of these magnitudes are difficult to produce, careful planning is required to ensure that the chamber is capable of producing the required environment. Typical apparatus consists of electrically driven air modulators coupled to the chamber by exponential horns.
4.1.2.2 Vibration Equipment
To induce the lower frequency part of the vibration and to simulate exceptional dynamic events, the test item may be driven by one or more electrodynamic or electrohydraulic exciters. Ensure attachment to the exciters does not interfere with the acoustic field or significantly change the natural frequencies of the test item. With large, complex shaped, or unbalanced test items (cruise missiles, electronic countermeasures stores, munition dispensers, etc.), this is likely to require multiple exciters driving a softly suspended store through rod-and-collar drive links. For small, slender test items (air-to-air missiles, etc.) this may sometimes be accomplished by driving the test item through its usual interface with an aircraft, e.g., launcher. However, even for such small, slender test items, a softly suspended test item driven through a rod-and-collar arrangement may be needed. Typically, electrodynamic exciters are used. In cases where there are high levels of vibration required at low frequency (e.g., buffet vibration), electrodynamic exciters may not be capable of producing the required amplitudes (particularly the high velocity and displacement amplitudes). In these cases electrohydraulic exciters may be the better choice. Electrohydraulic exciters are not capable of producing the high frequencies required in typical avionics vibration tests.
4.1.3 Temperature Equipment
Ensure the range of temperatures and rate of change of the test item’s skin temperature is adequate to achieve the test profile. A typical range is -40 °C to +85 °C (-40 °F to +185 °F); the rate of change may be as high as 4 °C/min (7 °F/min). Temperature conditioning of the test item must be compatible with the acoustic field. In order to isolate the test item from the air in the acoustic chamber and the chamber walls, the test item may be enclosed in a thin, flexible shroud through which temperature conditioned air is ducted. This increases the thermal efficiency and permits high
rates of temperature change. The shrouds must be transparent to the acoustic field. Making the shroud close fitting so as to raise the air speed around the test item enhances the heat transfer rate. Rip-stop nylon cloth has proven to be a suitable shroud material. Injection of liquid nitrogen is useful for achieving high rates of cooling. Air temperatures more extreme than the desired skin temperatures may be used to increase the heat transfer rate, but care must be taken to avoid creating excessive gradients along the surface.
4.1.4 Electrical Stress
The operation duty cycle and the functional testing of the test item will provide the basic electrical stress. Cycle the test item on and off as dictated by the mission simulation. Correlate voltage variation or other electrical parameters with temperature. Reproduce additional electrical stresses such as voltage spikes, dropouts, and ripples if they are known to occur in service.
4.2 Instrumentation
To meet the test environment specification, acceleration, acoustic pressure, and temperature will be the measurement variables, with acceleration the primary response monitoring variable. On occasion other environment measurement variables may be employed, e.g., to measure moisture or humidity. In these cases special consideration will need to be given to the equipment specification to satisfy the calibration, measurement, and analysis requirements. All measurement instrumentation must be calibrated to traceable national calibration standards (see Part One, paragraph 5.3.2). In addition, instrumentation to measure test item function may be required. In this case, obtain and adhere to suitable calibration standards. The measurement device and its mounting will be compatible with the requirements and guidelines provided in paragraph 6.1, reference j.
- a. Accelerometer:
- (1) Frequency Response: A flat frequency response within ± 5 percent across the frequency range of interest is required.
- (2) Transverse sensitivity should be less than or equal to 5 percent.
- (3) Nearly all transducers are affected by high and low temperatures. Understand and compensate for temperature sensitivity deviation as required. Temperature sensitivity deviations at the test temperature of interest should be no more than ± 5% relative to the temperature at which the transducer sensitivity was established.
- (4) Base Strain sensitivity should be evaluated in the selection of any accelerometer. Establishing limitations on base strain sensitivity is often case specific based upon the ratio of base strain to anticipated translational acceleration.
- b. Microphone:
- (1) An amplitude linearity within 10 percent from 5 percent to 100 percent of the peak pressure amplitude required for testing.
- (2) A flat frequency response within ±10 percent across the frequency range 10 – 10000 Hz.
- (3) Microphone and its mounting compatible with the requirements and guidelines in paragraph 6.1, reference j.
- c. Temperature gage:
- (1) An amplitude linearity within 10 percent from 5 percent to 100 percent of the peak temperature amplitude required for testing.
- (2) A flat frequency response capable of detecting temperature rates at 50°C/min (90°F/min).
- (3) Temperature gage and its mounting compatible with the requirements and guidelines in paragraph 6.1, reference j.
- d. Other Measurement Devices. Consistent with the requirements of the test.
- e. Signal conditioning. Use only signal conditioning that is compatible with the instrumentation requirements on the test, and that is compatible with the requirements and guidelines provided in reference m. In
particular, filtering of the analog voltage signals will be consistent with the time history response requirements (in general, demonstrable sharp filter rolloff at the bandpass filter cutoff frequencies for acceleration and acoustic pressure, linear phase from DC to the filter cutoff for temperature gage), and filtering will be so configured that anomalous data caused by amplifier clipping will not be misinterpreted as response data, i.e., input to the amplifier will be filtered, but not the amplifier output. For acceleration related to shock data, filtering will require a linear phase filter from DC to the filter cutoff.
- f. Special monitoring instrumentation concerns. To control the test it is desirable to apply information from all active instrumentation in a feedback loop. Specifically, any information that indicates an out-of- tolerance test stress (e.g., temperature too high) or an out-of-tolerance test item response (e.g., excessive current draw) is cause to stop the test and initiate an investigation to determine the cause. Paragraphs 4.3.3 to 4.3.8 provide guidance for functional, vibrational (acoustic plus mechanical), temperature, humidity and power monitoring/control to ensure the test requirements are met.
- (1) Functional monitoring.
- (2) Vibration monitoring/control.
- (a) Air modulators.
- (b) Mechanical stimulus.
- (3) Temperature monitoring/control.
- (4) Humidity monitoring.
- (5) Power monitoring.
4.3 Controls / Tolerances
- a. Calibration. Ensure all environment measurement devices, e.g., accelerometers, microphones, thermal gages, have calibrations traceable as noted in Part One, paragraph 5.3.2. Verify calibration of the system with a calibration device before beginning the test procedure. If not available, provide a suitable method for verification of the appropriate response. After processing the measured response data from the calibration device and verifying that measurements are in conformance with the specifications, remove the calibration device and perform the test on the designated test item. Calibrate equipment to record the function of the test item according to the test item performance specification.
- b. Tolerances. For test validation and control of the test, use the environment measurement tolerances specified under the test procedure, and guidance provided in Method 514, paragraph 4.2.2. In cases in which these tolerances cannot be met, establish and document achievable tolerances and ensure they are agreed to by the cognizant engineering authority and the customer prior to initiation of the test. In any case, establish tolerances within the limitations of the specified measurement calibration, instrumentation, signal conditioning and data analysis procedures. Establish tolerances on equipment to record the functional performance of the test item according to the test item performance specification.
4.3.1 Test Interruption
Test interruptions can result from two or more situations, one being from failure or malfunction of test chambers or associated test laboratory equipment. The second type of test interruption results from failure or malfunction of the test item itself during operational checks.
4.3.2 Interruption Due to Test Facility Malfunction
- a. General. See Part One, paragraph 5.11 of this standard.
- b. Specific to this method.
- (1) Undertest interruption. If an unscheduled interruption occurs that causes the test conditions to fall below allowable limits, note the immediate conditions of the test item (temperature, etc.) and the point in the composite mission cycle, and stop the test. Determine the root cause of the undertest condition (e.g., the store is not achieving the proper skin temperature because of a Temperature Conditioning Unit (TCU) failure, or the desired vibration response levels are not being met because an acoustic
MIL-STD-810H
METHOD 523.4
modulator valve assembly has failed). Take corrective action to get all test equipment in proper working condition. Return the test item to the required conditions prior to the interruption, and continue the test from that point.
- (2) Overtest interruption. If the test item is exposed to test conditions that exceed allowable limits, give the test item an appropriate physical examination and operational check (when practical) before resuming the test. This is especially true where a safety condition may exist such as with munitions. If a safety problem is discovered, the preferable course of action is to terminate the test and reinitiate it with a new test item. (If this safety problem is not so resolved and test item failure occurs during the remainder of the test, the test results may be considered invalid.) If no problem is identified, reestablish pre- interruption conditions and continue from the point where the test tolerances were exceeded.
4.3.3 Interruption Due to Test Item Operation Failure
Failure of the test item(s) to function as required during operational checks presents a situation with several possible options.
- a. The preferable option is to replace the test item with a “new” one and restart from Step 1.
- b. A second option is to replace / repair the failed or non-functioning component or assembly with one that functions as intended, and restart the entire test from Step 1.
NOTE: When evaluating failure interruptions, consider prior testing on the same test item and consequences of such.
4.3.4 Functional Monitoring
Monitor test item functions continuously during the test. This may consist of a simplified measurement of overall performance. If so, perform a full functional evaluation at least once per environmental cycle. Full functional evaluations are recommended at both the high and low temperatures and at maximum vibration. Failures may be intermittent, irreversible, or reversible with changes in the environment. Ensure procedures for dealing with indicated failures are clearly defined. Verify functions that cannot be verified in the environmental test chamber by removing and testing the store at short intervals as compared to its expected MTBF. Note that any statistical assessment of the store reliability must take into account the test interval (paragraph 6.1, reference k). Statistical test plans such as those in MIL-HDBK-781 (paragraph 6.1, reference l), usually assume continuous monitoring.
4.3.5 Vibration Monitoring and Control
Vibration is induced both by the acoustic field and by mechanical shakers. Experimentally determine the vibration and acoustic inputs required to provide the required store response as in paragraphs a. and b. below. Once the required vibration input has been established, input control the vibration exciter(s) to this measured signal by closed loop automatic control system(s). This will provide greater test consistency than trying to control vibration exciters with feedback from response measurements. Monitor the response and when significant differences between measure and required responses are detected, stop the test and determine the cause. Looseness or wear in the vibration input train, problems with monitoring transducer mounting or wiring, and differences in response of nominally identical stores may significantly affect response (paragraph 6.1, reference m). In particular, instrumented stores that have experienced many hours of severe captive flight conditions and which are used to calibrate vibration tests may be considerably less responsive than a new test store.
- a. Air modulators. The acoustic field may be generated by air modulators supplied with low-pressure 239 kPa to 446 kPa (20 to 50 psig) air. These modulators are coupled to the reverberant chamber through exponential horns. Considerable acoustic power is required, so several modulators may be needed for one chamber. Horns having a lower cutoff frequency of approximately 200 Hz may be used. The drive signal to the modulators is shaped random noise; it may be supplied from a noise generator signal that is shaped by filtering or from a pre-recorded signal. The shape of the acoustic spectrum is determined by adjusting it to produce (approximately) the same vibration response in an instrumented store as the vibration response measured in captive carry of that store. Microphones monitor the acoustic level and spectrum. Refer to Method 515 for microphone placement, test level tolerances, and further guidance.
MIL-STD-810H
METHOD 523.4
- b. Mechanical stimulus. The drive signal to the electrodynamic and electrohydraulic shakers is shaped random noise; it may be supplied from a noise generator signal that is shaped by filtering or from a prerecorded signal. Determine the shape of the vibration spectrum by adjusting it to produce the same vibration response in an instrumented store as the vibration response measured in the captive carry environment of that store. Adjust the acoustic input first and maintain it during compensation of the shaker drive signal. After the shaker drive signal has been compensated so as to reproduce the desired response vibration, record the vibration spectra and levels at the shaker attachments to the store as secondary standards to be used during the test. During the test, monitor vibration level and spectra with accelerometers at these points along with the store response control points. Monitor these signals throughout the test. For closed loop control of the shakers use the vibration as measured at the shaker/drive system interface. When the shakers are used only to provide the low frequency portion of the vibration spectrum, closed loop control may not be necessary. Refer to Method 514 for test level tolerances and further guidance.
4.3.6 Temperature Monitoring and Control
The temperature that defines the temperature test cycle is the store skin temperature that is measured and used for feedback control during the test. The air temperature may be driven to more extreme values (as much as 20 °C (36 °F)) beyond the store range) in order to increase the rate of transfer. Monitor the air temperature separately in order to avoid values outside this range. In developing the temperature cycle, measure the store skin temperature at several points to ensure even distribution of the temperature.
4.3.7 Humidity Monitoring
Although humidity is not a controlled variable for Procedure I, the ducted airstream may be monitored for moisture content, either by dewpoint or relative humidity sensing. Moisture can collect on a store’s surface when it has reached and holds a cold temperature that is below the dewpoint of warmer air following in the mission cycle. This is a normal and expected condition.
4.3.8 Power Monitoring
Continuously monitor all electrical and other power inputs (e.g., hydraulic, compressed air) whether or not they are modified to simulated mission conditions. This monitoring provides an immediate indication of many types of failures and, with automatic controls, may serve to limit secondary failures.
4.4 Data Analysis
- a. Use an analog anti-alias filter configuration on all digitized signals that will:
- (1) not alias more than a five percent measurement error into the frequency band of interest.
- (2) have linear phase-shift characteristics for the temperature gage and acceleration shock from DC to the upper band edge.
- (3) have a uniform passband to within one dB across the frequency band of interest (see paragraph 4.2).
- b. In subsequent processing of the data, use any additional digital filtering that is compatible with the anti-alias analog filtering. In particular, additional digital filtering must maintain phase linearity for processing temperature gage data and any acceleration shock data.
- c. Analysis procedures will be in accordance with those requirements and guidelines provided in paragraph 6.1, reference j. If anomalies are detected, discard the potentially invalid measured response time history data.
4.5 Test Execution
4.5.1 Preparation for Test
- a. General. See Part One, paragraph 5.8.
- b. Unique to this method. Verify that environmental monitoring and measurement sensors are of an appropriate type and properly located to obtain the required test data.
MIL-STD-810H METHOD 523.4
4.5.2 Pretest Checkout
The following steps describe in detail the pretest set-up and cycle check procedure. The purpose of the pretest set-up is to provide a level of confidence that the test specification can be met on a test item. In general, this pretest checkout will require adjustment of the vibration sources to provide the best reproduction of the in-service vibration. Vibration response is subject to the following three sources of error: spatial, spectral, and amplitude. Since it may not be possible to minimize all of these errors simultaneously, compromises between the three kinds of error must be based on technical analysis and judgment. To better define and understand the cause behind the source of errors, each error will be described briefly along with potential corrective measures to reduce the error. It is important to note that both the in-service measured and laboratory replicated vibro-acoustic fields are spatially non-homogeneous and highly random.
- a. Relative spatial acceleration amplitude. Because the in-service acoustic and vibration environment result from many sources that cannot be replicated in the laboratory, relative vibration levels at different locations within the test item may not correspond with measured relative vibration levels of the store at the same locations in service. Reduction of this error may require relocation of attachment shakers, use of multiple shakers, a reorientation with respect to the acoustic field (from directional horns), or selective application of acoustic damping material. In addition, the effectiveness of the acoustic field in inducing vibration may vary with the air temperature within the shrouds surrounding the test item. In general, the test set-up provides fewer degrees of freedom for exciting the test item than the degrees of freedom available for the store in service. It is important to note that cross spectra are not usually specified from in-service measured data, nor are they considered a control parameter for the test. To some extent, the input excitation from various sources is assumed to be uncorrelated.
- b. Spectral shape error. Because the in-service acoustic and vibration environment comes from many sources that cannot be replicated in the laboratory, the spectral shape at different locations within the test item may not correspond with the spectral shape of the test item at the same locations in service. This may be corrected by changing the spectrum of the acoustic and/or shaker drive signals or it may require changing the method of supporting the test item. Since cross spectra are not usually specified from in-service- measured data and are not considered a control parameter for the test, only limited correction may be possible.
- c. Amplitude error. For stationary random data, generally the amplitude distribution is assumed to be Gaussian. However, for in-service measured data, the distribution may be non-Gaussian – particularly for high-level maneuver events. The test setup should check the test item amplitude distribution to assure that it matches the in-service measured amplitude distribution. This means that particular care must be given to inherent shaker control system amplitude limiting; e.g., 3σ clipping. For replication of a given autospectral density estimate with Gaussian amplitude distribution, ensure the shaker control system truncation is at a value greater than three times the RMS level (because of the long test durations it is important to have accelerations that exceed three times the RMS level). In general, to replicate an autospectral density estimate with a non-Gaussian amplitude distribution, specialized shaker control system software is required.
4.5.3 Test Setup and Cycle Check Procedure
- Step 1. Using an instrumented test item (not necessarily operable), assemble the test item and environmental apparatus into the planned configuration. If the planned test is based on in-service measured values, it is important that the sensors and their locations be identical to those used in these measurements. It is highly desirable that the identical test item used in the in-service measurements, with its instrumentation intact, be used in the test setup.
- Step 2. Install and calibrate all sensors. Concurrently, test the function of any automatic alarm or abort mechanisms.
- Step 3. Apply and adjust the acoustic stimulus to the minimum level. Verify the levels and spectral shape. Apply higher levels in steps until the required maximum is reached. Adjust the spectral shape as required at each level.
MIL-STD-810H
METHOD 523.4
Step 4. Apply the adjusted acoustic stimulus at the lowest required level. Apply an arbitrary, low-level vibration stimulus. Measure vibration response and iteratively adjust the vibration drive signal to achieve the required responses.
Step 5. Adjust both the acoustic and vibration stimuli to their maximum levels. Adjust the vibration drive signal and, if necessary, the acoustic drive signal until the highest required levels of vibration response are achieved.
Step 6. Adjust acoustic and vibration stimuli to each of the required intermediate levels and measure the responses. If the responses at each level are reasonably close (engineering judgement required) to the required levels, maintain the calibrations for the highest response level and iterate to the other levels by changing the overall levels of the drive signals (accuracy of the simulation is more important at the higher levels). If response variation is strongly non-linear with the stimulus level, establish calibrations for each level.
Step 7. Apply the maximum temperature stimulus to the store. Adjust the temperature controller and ducting to achieve the desired skin temperatures and rates of change. Ensure the distribution of temperature values over the skin is within tolerances as determined from the thermal model. Ensure that required temperature rates-of-change can be achieved.
Step 8. Conduct a composite mission profile cycle, including power on/off and operational tests. Measure skin temperatures and correct any problems. Ensure that temperature rate-of-change requirements can be met. Repeat as necessary.
Step 9. Run a composite mission temperature cycle and duty cycle at the highest offset and another at the lowest offset. Measure the skin temperatures and correct any problems. Repeat as necessary.
Step 10. Place an operable test item into the test setup. Repeat Steps 1 and 2 if this is a test item not previously subjected to those steps.
Step 11. Provide power to the test item as required and conduct a test of its function.
Step 12. Repeat Step 11 with vibration applied, under high temperature and then under low temperature.
4.5.4 Procedure
The following general procedure will vary depending on the test type conducted as shown in Table 523.4-I:
Step 1. Prepare the test item in its test configuration as described in paragraph 4.5.3.
Step 2. Verify the functional status of the test item.
Step 3. Start the test using conditions specified in the test plan developed from test tailoring guidelines.
Step 4. Conduct the test and monitor the operational status of the test item per paragraph 4.5.3.
Step 5. If a test item failure occurs, refer to paragraph 4.3.3.
Step 6. If a test interruption occurs, proceed according to the procedure called out in paragraph 4.3.1.
Step 7. Continue the test until termination criteria are met according to the procedure called out in paragraph 3.1.b(5). Document the results for comparison with pretest data.
MIL-STD-810H
METHOD 523.4
| TEST TYPE | PURPOSE | APPLICATION | TYPE OF INFORMATION REQUIRED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAILURE MODES | TIME TO FAILURE | |||
| Test, Analyze, and Fix (TAAF) | Reveal and correct design weaknesses | Development of a more reliable design prior to production. | Essential to induce potential service failures. | Not important |
| Reliability Demonstration | Show whether or not a design meets the specified reliability. | Start of production is usually based on a successful reliability demonstration. | Important only if the demonstration is unsuccessful. | Essential. |
| Screening | Reveal workmanship or component defects before a production unit leaves the factory, i.e., while repair is cheap. | Part of the manufacturer's internal testing to assure delivery of reliable units during production. | Essential to induce failures in defective areas; such failures should not then appear in service. | Not important. |
| Lot Acceptance | Estimate the MTBF of the lot units from the time to failure of a small sample. | Determination as to whether the lot is of acceptable quality. | Important only if the lot is rejected. | Essential that successive lot measures be consistent and comparable. Baseline similarity to service MTBF is desirable. |
| Source Comparison | Determine the relative reliability of units from the time to failure of a small sample. | Determination as to which of two sources should get the larger share of a production buy. | Important for improvements at the poorer source. | Only consistency comparability is essential. |